EdTeacherAI
Back to Newsletter

Decide what good looks like before asking AI

Dr. Steve Troyer · October 5, 2026

Decide what good looks like before asking AI

An AI response can sound polished and still miss the work a teacher needs it to do. The sentences read smoothly. The lesson plan has familiar headings. The email has a friendly opening. What takes longer to notice is whether the response serves the students, families, or colleagues who will use it.

One useful place to begin is before the prompt. Write down what a good result would need to do, then use that description to examine the draft.

This does not require a new rubric for every small task. A few plain sentences can make the difference between accepting something because it looks finished and deciding that it is ready for its purpose.

Start with work you recognize

Choose a recurring task you understand well. It might be a family update, a set of discussion questions, or the directions for an assignment. Begin with fictional, public, or non-sensitive material in a tool your school permits. Keep student records, identifying family details, and other confidential material out of a general-purpose tool unless your school's approved process explicitly permits that use.

For a first attempt, keep the task small enough that you can inspect the whole response. Asking for one set of directions gives you a clearer comparison than asking for a complete unit you will not have time to review.

Before opening the AI platform, finish this sentence: "This will be useful if..."

For assignment directions, the answer might be: "A student can tell what to produce, how to begin, and what to do when they need help." For a family update, it might be: "A family can find the important date, understand the next step, and hear a respectful tone without having to search for the point."

Those are examples to adapt, not tested measures of learning or universal standards. Your students and your purpose should shape the description.

Give AI a purpose and boundaries

Turn your description into a short request. Here is a starting pattern:

> Help me draft directions for a fictional classroom task. Students will compare two public examples and explain one difference. The directions should name what students will produce, give a clear first step, and explain how to ask for help. Use plain language. Do not invent a deadline, grading policy, accommodation, or source. If a detail is missing, identify it for me rather than filling it in.

The request gives AI something to work toward. It also names details the tool should not decide. Replace the fictional task with your own permitted material and add the information you actually have.

A prompt can improve a starting draft. It does not settle whether the draft is appropriate. That judgment remains with the educator who understands the task and the people involved.

Review against the description

Read the response beside your original description. Can a student identify the product? Is the first step clear? Does the help instruction reflect a process you really use? Look for details that sound reasonable but were not supplied, such as a due date, a grading rule, or a claim about what students already know.

Then revise the parts that need your judgment. You may decide to change the vocabulary, break one direction into smaller steps, or remove an example that could confuse the class. You may also decide that the AI draft is less useful than writing the directions yourself. Keeping that possibility open makes the comparison more honest.

Save your quality description alongside the final version. The next time you do similar work, you have a starting point for both the prompt and the review.

Give colleagues something they can use

If you share the process, include the task, your description of a useful result, and one example of a revision you made. That helps a colleague see the decision behind the final copy without needing private classroom information.

For school leaders, the same approach can support professional learning. Invite teachers to bring a small, non-sensitive example and explain the quality check they used. Leave room for differences between subjects, grade levels, and classroom purposes. A common review habit can be useful without requiring identical prompts or identical materials.

For more help shaping the request, read How to get better answers from AI.

For your next small task, write "This will be useful if..." before you ask for a draft. Keep that sentence beside you when you decide what to use.

Written by Dr. Steve Troyer, The #1 AI Educator for Educators. Founder of Willow Run Group and EdTeacherAI, former superintendent of a 2,500-student district, twenty-two years in public education.